Skip to content
feelingstream
//Service quality & consistency

Score 100% of conversations, not a sample

Most quality programmes review a handful of calls per agent each month — often around 1% of the total. That is enough to satisfy a compliance box, but far too little to coach fairly or catch a problem early. If you review 1% of conversations, you are guessing about the other 99%.

The result is unfair scores, missed risks and coaching built on whichever calls happened to be picked. Sampling was always a workaround for the fact that humans can't review everything. Automation removes that limit.

How Feelingstream helps

Feelingstream transcribes every call with speech-to-text and, together with chats and emails, evaluates each one against your existing scorecard. The same checks a manual reviewer would apply — identity verification, mandatory disclosures, tone, correct process, resolution — run on every conversation, automatically.

Each evaluation is shown beside its evidence: the transcript, and for calls the time-aligned audio. Reviewers add comments where human judgement matters, so automation handles the scale while people handle the nuance. Nothing is a black box; every score can be traced back to what was actually said.

What you can measure

  • Review coverage rising from a small sample to 100% of conversations
  • Fewer disputed or inconsistent scores between reviewers
  • Earlier detection of compliance and quality risks
  • Team-wide score trends that reveal where to focus coaching

Where to go next

Ready to score every conversation against your own scorecard instead of a sample? Book a demo.

Frequently asked questions

How can every conversation be scored instead of a sample?
Calls are transcribed and, together with chats and emails, evaluated automatically against your scorecard. Because the process is automated it scales to 100% of conversations rather than a manual sample.
Do we have to change our existing scorecard?
No. Your current quality criteria become the evaluation questions, so the programme you already run is simply applied consistently and at full scale.
Can reviewers still check or override a result?
Yes. Every evaluation is shown next to the transcript and time-aligned audio, and reviewers can add comments to record context, coaching points or disagreement.

← All use cases